Sunday, March 10, 2013

Hot chicks: At 60, Peeps more popular than ever

It's Easter morning. A boy rouses his younger brother, and they run to the living room to find their baskets filled with ? what else? ? Peeps.

"Peeps are THE candy of Easter," the excited boy tells his wide-eyed sibling, who pops a yellow marshmallow chick in his mouth.

"You can eat 'em, smash 'em, microwave 'em, deep fry 'em, roast 'em on a stick," the boy explains. That's not all. You can make "historically accurate Peeps dioramas ... Peeps pop art ... You can make a Peeps topiary." On he goes, all day and night. "Peeps jousting ... hide-and-go Peeps ... Peepshi ... that's sushi made out of Peeps."

As the storied candy brand celebrates its 60th anniversary this year, Peeps' first TV ad in a decade captures an essential truth about the spongy confection made of sugar, corn syrup and gelatin: Love them or hate them, people do all sorts of things with Peeps, only some of which involve giving them to kids at Easter or eating them straight from the box.

And they're not shy about sharing.

"Everyone seems to have a Peeps story," says Ross Born, third-generation operator of Just Born Inc., which hatches 5 million Peeps a day at its plant 60 miles north of Philadelphia. "And they are free and willing to talk about how they eat their Peeps, how they cure them, how they store them, how they decorate with them. And these are adults!"

Just Born calls it the "Peepsonality" of consumers who buy Peeps not only to eat, but also to play around with.

"If you had asked me about this 25 years ago, I would've been rather bewildered about the whole thing," Born confesses. "We were candymakers."

Not that he's complaining. Just Born had its best year financially in 2012.

His grandfather, Russian immigrant Sam Born, started the candy company out of a Brooklyn storefront 90 years ago. Born advertised the freshness of his product with a sign that said "Just Born." The name stuck.

The burgeoning business moved to Bethlehem and acquired the Peeps brand with its 1953 purchase of Rodda Candy Co. of Lancaster. Best known for its jelly beans, Rodda had also introduced a small line of marshmallow chicks and bunnies, employing dozens of women who hand-squeezed them out of pastry bags. "It was really very difficult, and these women were strong," said David Shaffer, Sam Born's nephew and co-CEO along with Ross Born.

Ross's father, Bob Born ? a physicist and engineer by training ? automated the process in the mid-1950s, and a version of the machine he invented is still in use today, extruding millions of those familiar shapes on peak-Peep production days.

The company, whose other brands are Hot Tamales, Mike and Ike, and Goldenberg's Peanut Chews, has never suffered an unprofitable year. But its growth has always been relatively slow, steady and controlled, and a few years ago, Born and Shaffer decided they wanted to accelerate it.

The longtime partners brought in a new management team, spent heavily on marketing and broke back into the chocolate business, introducing chocolate-dipped Peeps as well as Peepsters, small chocolate candies filled with marshmallow-flavored cream. (New for this year is a yellow chick nestled in a hollow chocolate egg.) They also focused on holiday seasons other than Easter, particularly Christmas.

The result: Shaffer says last year was "off the charts." While Just Born is privately held and does not disclose revenue, he says it posted double-digit growth across all brands. And Shaffer sees more growth potential as the confectioner works to position its products in warehouse clubs and convenience stores.

Just Born certainly benefits from being part of a $33 billion candy industry that is seen as basically recession-proof, offering an inexpensive indulgence during tough economic times.

"Candy did not seem to take the hit that some other industries faced in recent years. We think a big reason for that is candy's place in our hearts and minds," says Susan Whiteside of the National Confectioners Association, a trade group.

Long associated with Easter, Peeps have penetrated the pop-culture consciousness in a way that other candy brands have not.

Aficionados send chicks into battle in a microwave "sport" known as Peeps jousting. They enter Peeps art contests, dozens of which are held around the country this time of year. They innovate recipes like "Peepza," a desert pizza. They write cheeky blog entries with titles like "101 Fun Ways to Torture a Peep."

Hoping to capitalize, Just Born recently opened three Peeps & Co. retail stores in Pennsylvania, Maryland and Minnesota.

While the company churns out more than 1 billion Peeps this Easter season ? a record ? it sees the 60th anniversary as another marketing opportunity and a chance to connect with its fans. In addition to the TV ad campaign, it's ramping up social media promoting a Facebook survey that asks knowing questions like this one: Do you like your Peeps fresh, frozen, or "aged to perfection"?

So which is it, Ross Born? Fresh or stale?

He's happy to address that perennial Peeps debate. Just don't ask him to take sides.

"There's a lot of gray area here," Born says diplomatically. "There are people who tell me they put a one-inch slice in the film (that seals the box), and they'll lay it on top of their refrigerator for two days. No more, no less. Then they are PERFECT to eat.

"So it's not necessarily stale, it's just a little firmer. All right? It's just like politics," says Just Born's commander-in-Peep. "You've got people way on one side, and way on the other side, but there are a whole lot of people in the middle."

Source: http://www.nbcnews.com/business/hot-chicks-60-peeps-more-popular-ever-1C8769122

channel 5 news uc berkeley harrison barnes brett ratner stevie nicks anchorman capybara

Dr. Dre Gave Kendrick Lamar 'All The Confidence In The World'

MTV's #1 'Hottest MC' said Aftermath mastermind left good kid, m.A.A.d city untouched.
By Rob Markman, with reporting by Sway Calloway


Kendrick Lamar
Photo: Getty Images

Source: http://www.mtv.com/news/articles/1703281/hottest-mcs-2013-kendrick-lamar-dr-dre.jhtml

Mother Jones cars Bacon Number Kate Middleton photos Chi Magazine Kate Middleton Nude Photos glee

Saturday, March 9, 2013

Polish Biobattery Is Powered by People, Not Potatoes

Implantable medical devices have come a long way since doctors installed world's first pacemaker in Arne Larsson's chest in 1958 but they've always been hamstrung by a reliance external power sources. However, a new zinc-air battery chemistry developed by Institute of Physical Chemistry in Poland could eventually provide its host's implants with an unlimited power supply. Let the cyborg revolution begin. More »


Source: http://feeds.gawker.com/~r/gizmodo/full/~3/PSzR82BHFZ8/polish-bio+battery-is-powered-by-people-not-potatoes

albert pujols the shining mariano rivera mariano rivera jobs report tiger woods masters 2012 nikki haley

Friday, March 8, 2013

Study: States with more gun control have fewer gun deaths

CHICAGO (AP) ? States with the most gun control laws have the fewest gun-related deaths, according to a study that suggests sheer quantity of measures might make a difference.

But the research leaves many questions unanswered and won't settle the debate over how policymakers should respond to recent high-profile acts of gun violence.

In the dozen or so states with the most gun control-related laws, far fewer people were shot to death or killed themselves with guns than in the states with the fewest laws, the study found. Overall, states with the most laws had a 42 percent lower gun death rate than states with the least number of laws.

The results are based on an analysis of 2007-2010 gun-related homicides and suicides from the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The researchers also used data on gun control measures in all 50 states compiled by the Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence, a well-known gun control advocacy group. They compared states by dividing them into four equal-sized groups according to the number of gun laws.

The results were published online Wednesday in the medical journal JAMA Internal Medicine.

More than 30,000 people nationwide die from guns every year nationwide, and there's evidence that gun-related violent crime rates have increased since 2008, a journal editorial noted.

During the four-years studied, there were nearly 122,000 gun deaths, 60 percent of them suicides.

"Our motivation was really to understand what are the interventions that can be done to reduce firearm mortality," said Dr. Eric Fleegler, the study's lead author and an emergency department pediatrician and researcher at Boston Children's Hospital.

He said his study suggests but doesn't prove that gun laws ? or something else ? led to fewer gun deaths.

Fleegler is also among hundreds of doctors who have signed a petition urging President Barack Obama and Congress to pass gun safety legislation, a campaign organized by the advocacy group Doctors for America.

Gun rights advocates have argued that strict gun laws have failed to curb high murder rates in some cities, including Chicago and Washington, D.C. Fleegler said his study didn't examine city-level laws, while gun control advocates have said local laws aren't as effective when neighboring states have lax laws.

Previous research on the effectiveness of gun laws has had mixed results, and it's a "very challenging" area to study, said Dr. Daniel Webster, director of the Johns Hopkins Center For Gun Policy. He was not involved in the current study.

The strongest kind of research would require comparisons between states that have dissimilar gun laws but otherwise are nearly identical, "but there isn't a super nice twin for New Jersey," for example, a state with strict gun laws, Webster noted.

Fleegler said his study's conclusions took into account factors also linked with gun violence, including poverty, education levels and race, which vary among the states.

The average annual gun death rate ranged from almost 3 per 100,000 in Hawaii to 18 per 100,000 in Louisiana. Hawaii had 16 gun laws, and along with New Jersey, New York and Massachusetts was among states with the most laws and fewest deaths. States with the fewest laws and most deaths included Alaska, Kentucky, Louisiana and Oklahoma.

But there were outliers: South Dakota, for example, had just two guns laws but few deaths.

Editorial author Dr. Garen Wintemute, director the Violence Prevention Research Program at the University of California, Davis, said the study doesn't answer which laws, if any, work.

Wintemute said it's likely that gun control measures are more readily enacted in states with few gun owners ? a factor that might have more influence on gun deaths than the number of laws.

___

Online:

JAMA Internal Medicine: http://www.jamainternalmed.com

CDC: http://www.cdc.gov

___

AP Medical Writer Lindsey Tanner can be reached at http://www.twitter.com

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/more-gun-laws-fewer-deaths-50-state-study-224508338.html

politico Tammy Baldwin house of representatives paul ryan michele bachmann donald trump Election 2012 map

The Hidden Mysteries of NYU's IRS Returns ? NYU Local

Ever wondering where your tuition payments are going? Well the solution is (kind of) here! Check out the?NYU IRS returns, readily available on this beautiful Internet of ours. Being a non-profit organization, the University receives tax exemptions but must also disclose these documents. But beware: the files might create more questions than answers.

Specifically, what the hell is the New York University Real Estate Corporation? Not to mention, how did the corporation?s net assets jump from $483,595 to $25,193,870 in just seven years?

Well turns out that the history of the corporation is not one of great scandal, laced with sex, drugs and real estate. Rather, it?s the story of how NYU came to own the properties just above Washington Square Park.

In 1801, the will of Robert Richard Randall denoted that his Manhattan property, 24 acres of rural land north and east of today?s Washington Square, would become a hospital and home for aged sailors. The estate would be called, ?Sailor?s Snug Harbor.?

But the children of Randall?s half brother challenged the will and, by the time the matter, was settled the area around the farmland transformed into a city. The trustees of Snug Harbor decided to subdivide the land, build houses on Washington Square North, and construct stables along the Washington Mews.

After these properties were leased, Snug Harbor had enough money to buy a large plot of land in Staten Island. Come the 1960s, Snug Harbor looked to sell the land to modern developers; however, the City designated portions of the estate as historical landmarks and eventually purchased the entire property, which now serves as a recreational center and park.

So, how did NYU factor into this? Well, Snug Harbor leased the Washington Mews and adjacent area of 8th Street to NYU in the middle of the 20th century. The lease was to last about 200 years. But come the 1980s, Snug Harbor decided to sell the property to a different company, with the stipulation that NYU?s lease must remain intact.

But this company started falling into financial distress. NYU, under the NYU Real Estate Corporation, managed to officially purchase the property. The University decided to create this separate purchasing entity for two reasons: to protect the school from being wrapped up in the other company?s possible bankruptcy and, to guarantee the university?s non-profit tax exemptions would apply to the property, bought from a for-profit company.

The 2003 IRS return provides explanation for the corporation?s existence and tax exemption:

?New York University Real Estate Corporation was organized and is operated exclusively for the charitable purpose of acquiring real property and holding title to and collecting income from the such property and remitting the entire income of such property (less expenses) to New York University a 501(c)(3) corporation). The Income will be used to promote, encourage and sponsor study, research and other educational activities in the area of science and the practice of medicine.?

From 2003 to 2005 (the earliest documents available on the Internet), the NYU Real Estate Corporation appeared a reasonably sized subdivision of the university. This table sums up its profits, expenditures and assets during this time.

Year

Total revenue

Total Expenses

End of Year Net Assets

2003

$242,760

-$1,900

$483,595

2004

$244,666

-$200

$728,061

2005

$242,760

$0

$970,821

The expenditures represent the amount of money given to the University in support of science and medicine. The corporation gave $1900 in 2003; $200 in 2004; $0 in 2005. Also, in 2005,?John Sexton?s name appeared on the?corporation?s?IRS return for the first time.

But in 2006, all assets drained from the corporation to support the university.

Year

Total revenue

Total Expenses

End of Year Net Assets

2006

$0

-$970,821

$0

2007

$242,760

-$242,760

$0

During the next year, the net assets skyrocketed (to say the least). For the first time, the corporation listed building assets at $27,191,728, with $8,129,008 accumulated depreciation, a net of $19,062,720. In 2007, the corporation?s revenue, which came from rental income, equaled the exact cost of the program?s services for the year. ?All $242,760 fed into university services.

This massive jump in property assets came from NYU correcting a former mistake. The University previously reported the land?s value in the university tax forms, not those of the corporation.

Around this time, the University also decided the land no longer needed to be held in a separate entity. Over time, the corporation will be dissolved, with all assets being transferred to the university.

The beginnings of this process are noticeable in recent IRS forms.

Year

Total revenue

Total Expenses

New Net Building Assets

End of Year Net Assets

2008

$118,174

-$118,174

$19,062,720

$19,062,720

2009

$121,704

-$121,704

$10,736,565

$29,799,285

?

Year

Total revenue

Total Expenses

Prior Period Adjustments

End of Year Net Assets

2010

$62,306

-$1,246,580

-3,421,141

$25,193,870

Drawing full conclusions on the NYU?s assets, profits and?expenditures?from IRS returns is difficult, but these public documents offer anyone a way to keep tabs on the university. Rather interesting information, like the salaries of top professors and administrators, can be found with just a little digging.

[Image via Garry L?/ Shutterstock.com]

?

Source: http://nyulocal.com/city/2013/03/07/the-hidden-mysteries-of-nyus-irs-returns/

nfl standings Vicki Soto Adam Lanza fox news obama cnbc dexter

Bill would change animal abuse laws to animal trespass

One State Representative says animal abuse laws are unfairly being used against livestock owners. Rep. Joe Don McGaugh (R-Carrollton) tells the House Agri-Business Committee that there have been an increasing number of incidents where Missouri farmers are being charged with animal abuse or neglect because their cattle got out and on to neighboring property. He wants the provision to say ?animal trespass? instead.

The Missouri Cattlemen?s Association, Pork Producers, Federation of Animal Owners, and Sporting Dog Association spoke in favor of the measure.

However, Bob Baker with the Missouri Alliance for animal legislation says the bill does not specify that it would only apply to livestock and not companion animals. He says the legislation would add an increased burden of proof on prosecutors in legitimate abuse and neglect cases, especially in urban areas where first-time offenses are often put off for several months because of case overload. Baker agrees with Rep. Steve Hodges (D-East Prairie) who recommends taking dogs and other companion animals out of the bill.

Rep. Diane Franklin (R-Camdenton) suggested a timeline might be added to the bill, so that livestock owners have a certain amount of time to respond to accidental releases before they could be charged.

Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MissouriNews/~3/6FgTuayCsMQ/

news 10 hillary rosen j.k. rowling j.k. rowling axl rose google earnings pat burrell

Online gambling: How long until it's legal everywhere? - The ...

It used to be you had to go all the way to Las Vegas to play the slots. But soon, you may be able to gamble on your smartphone.

Thanks to improvements in technology, a change in federal rules and shifting political calculations, a push to legalize online and mobile gambling is picking up steam. Three states already have moved to allow it, and Silicon Valley tech companies, including San Francisco-based social gaming giant Zynga, are rushing to cash in.

"It's inevitable that this spreads pretty quickly," said Doug Walker, who studies casino gambling as a professor of economics at the College of Charleston in South Carolina.

Last month, the governors of New Jersey and Nevada signed laws to legalize online gambling in their states. And earlier this year, Delaware, which legalized online gambling last summer, solicited bids from companies to run the service that will oversee online gambling there.

Similar legalization proposals are being promoted in numerous other states, many of which are searching for new revenue to replace tax dollars wiped out by the Great Recession. In California, state Sen. Roderick Wright, D-Inglewood, has introduced a bill that would legalize all online gambling in the state, while state Sen. Lou Correa, D-Santa Ana, has proposed a bill that would legalize only online poker.

It's not just cash-strapped state governments that see a potential jackpot in online gambling. Casino operators and Silicon Valley tech firms are also pushing for legalization. Zynga, for example, is already moving to offer online gambling in the United Kingdom and Nevada.

Legalization proponents argue that many consumers already gamble online through offshore sites. By legalizing the activity, they say, states can tax and regulate it -- and U.S. companies can benefit.

"Prohibition, like the prohibition of alcohol, just doesn't work," said Joseph Kelly, a professor at Buffalo State College in New York who has consulted with governments outside the United States that have considered legalizing online gambling. "I like to think of (legalization) as recapturing revenues."

But gambling opponents, consumer advocates and addiction researchers warn of potentially dire consequences. They say the gaming industry will use techniques perfected in online advertising and marketing to target vulnerable consumers, leading to a spike in problem gambling and, more broadly, a rise in income inequality.

"This is the most predatory business in the country," said Les Bernal, national director of Stop Predatory Gambling, a nonprofit group opposed to commercial and state-sponsored gambling. "They're Continued...

about creating new players and getting them to be out of control."

Until little more than a year ago, much of the discussion about online gambling in the political realm was about banning it. But in late 2011, the U.S. Department of Justice revised its interpretation of the Federal Wire Act, a law designed to combat organized crime. The Justice Department determined that instead of banning all online gambling, the law applied only to sports betting.

The change allows states to legalize Internet gaming within their boundaries. But it potentially could also allow citizens from one state to gamble on Web or mobile sites hosted in another state, if the two states come up with an agreement to permit the practice. In the meantime, Congress has been considering a measure that would legalize interstate online gambling in whichever states authorize it.

So far, online gambling is still a limited business. Nevada's new law only legalizes online poker. And for now, only residents of the three states that have authorized online gambling can legally bet online.

But many experts think online gambling is a multibillion-dollar opportunity. New Jersey alone projects state revenues from casino gambling will nearly double over the next year to $436 million, thanks in large part to online gambling.

With the online gambling table open for bets, nontraditional players are trying to get a piece of the action. For years now, social gaming companies -- including Zynga -- have offered virtual poker and casino games, with players wagering virtual currencies rather than real dollars. Now those companies are starting to move into what they call "real money" gaming.

"This is a huge opportunity for game developers," said Christopher Griffin, founder and CEO of Betable, a company that works with software developers to legally add real-money betting to their games.

Entry of those nontraditional players into the gambling market worries consumer advocates and addiction researchers. Research into the effects of online gambling is still spotty, but early studies indicate it attracts younger gamblers and is strongly linked to pathological gambling.

Some worry online social gaming companies, which have become experts at using social networks such as Facebook to market their games to consumers, could use those networks to target those most likely to be addicted to casino games.

"Lawmakers are failing to protect consumers in their mad rush to approve online gaming," said Jeff Chester, executive director of the Center for Digital Democracy, a consumer advocacy group. "Without safeguards, individuals will be subjected to powerful online marketing campaigns designed to have them gamble away their hard-earned cash." Continued...

Betting on the Web

For years, it has been illegal for U.S. companies to offer online gambling. But the situation is changing rapidly.

What's happening: New Jersey and Nevada last month joined Delaware in approving legalized online gambling in their states. The moves followed a change by the U.S. Department of Justice in 2011 in its stance on whether Internet gambling is prohibited by federal law. The states are authorizing online gambling to various degrees: New Jersey will allow all games; Nevada, only online poker.

What's next: Other states, including California, are considering whether to make online gambling legal. For now, states can authorize gambling only within their borders. But a proposed federal law would legalize interstate gambling. Alternatively, states are considering creating one-by-one agreements with other states to allow gambling between their residents and companies.

What it will mean: In states that have authorized online gambling, residents will be able to play online poker for money, buy lottery tickets online and play casino games such as slot machines or blackjack, depending on what their state has authorized. Social gaming companies, including Zynga, also hope to offer real-money wagering and prizes in their games. Some consumer advocates worry casino and social gaming companies will use sophisticated online marketing techniques to target young people and those most likely to be problem gamblers.

Source: Staff research

Source: http://www.middletownpress.com/articles/2013/03/07/news/doc5138ad145a929645511883.txt

c. difficile carmelo anthony nurse jackie nurse jackie peeps nhl playoffs masters